When you're looking at the
underlying real estate, one of the most important criteria (aside from
location, location, location!) is the type of property. When
considering a purchase, you need to ask yourself whether the underlying
properties are, for example, residential homes, shopping malls,
warehouses, office towers or a combination of any of these. Each type of
real estate has a different set of drivers influencing its performance.
You can't simply assume one type of property will perform well in a
market where a different type is performing well. Likewise, you can't
assume one type of property will continue to be a good investment simply
because it has performed well in the past.
Income-Producing and Non-Income-Producing InvestmentsThere
are four broad types of income-producing real estate: offices, retail,
industrial and leased residential. There are many other less common
types as well, such as hotels, mini-storage, parking lots and seniors
care housing. The key criteria in these investments that we are focusing
on is that they are income producing.
Non-income-producing
investments, such as houses, vacation properties or vacant commercial
buildings, are as sound as income-producing investments. Just keep in
mind that if you invest equity in a non-income producing property you
will not receive any rent, so all of your return must be through capital appreciation.
If you invest in debt secured by non-income-producing real estate,
remember that the borrower's personal income must be sufficient to cover
the mortgage payments, because there is no tenant income to secure the
payments.
Office PropertyOffices
are the "flagship" investment for many real estate owners. They tend to
be, on average, the largest and highest profile property type because
of their typical location in downtown cores and sprawling suburban
office parks.
At its most fundamental level, the
demand for office space is tied to companies' requirement for office
workers, and the average space per office worker. The typical office
worker is involved in things like finance, accounting, insurance, real
estate, services, management and administration. As these "white-collar"
jobs grow, there is greater demand for office spaces.
Returns
from office properties can be highly variable because the market tends
to be sensitive to economic performance. One downside is that office
buildings have high operating costs, so if you lose a tenant it can have
a substantial impact on the returns for the property. However, in times
of prosperity, offices tend to perform extremely well, because demand
for space causes rental rates to increase and an extended time period is
required to build an office tower to relieve the pressure on the market
and rents.
Retail PropertyThere
is a wide variety of Retail properties, ranging from large enclosed
shopping malls to single tenant buildings in pedestrian zones. At the
present time, the Power Center format is in favor, with retailers
occupying larger premises than in the enclosed mall format, and having
greater visibility and access from adjacent roadways.
Many retail properties have an anchor,
which is a large, well-known retailer that acts as a draw to the
center. An example of a well-known anchor is Wal-Mart. If a retail
property has a food store as an anchor, it is said to be food-anchored or grocery-anchored;
such anchors would typically enhance the fundamentals of a property and
make it more desirable for investment. Often, a retail center has one
or more ancillary multi-bay buildings containing smaller tenants. One of
these small units is termed a commercial retail unit (CRU).
The
demand for retail space has many drivers. Among them are: location,
visibility, population density, population growth and relative income
levels. From an economic perspective, retails tend to perform best in
growing economies and when retail sales growth is high.
Returns
from Retails tend to be more stable than Offices, in part because
retail leases are generally longer and retailers are less inclined to
relocate as compared to office tenants.
Industrial PropertyIndustrials
are often considered the "staple" of the average real estate investor.
Generally, they require smaller average investments, are less management
intensive and have lower operating costs than their office and retail
counterparts.
There are varying types of industrials
depending on the use of the building. For example, buildings could be
used for warehousing, manufacturing, research and development, or
distribution. Some industrials can even have partial or full office
build-outs.
Some important factors to consider in an
industrial property would be functionality (for example, ceiling
height), location relative to major transport routes (including rail or
sea), building configuration, loading and the degree of specialization
in the space (such as whether it has cranes or freezers). For some uses,
the presence of outdoor or covered yard space is important.
Multi-family Residential PropertyMulti-family
residential property generally delivers the most stable returns,
because no matter what the economic cycle, people always need a place to
live. The result is that in normal markets, residential occupancy tends
to stay reasonably high. Another factor contributing to the stability
of residential property is that the loss of a single tenant has a
minimal impact on the bottom line, whereas if you lose a tenant in any other type of property the negative effects can be much more significant.
For most commercial property types, tenant leases are either net
or partially net, meaning that most operating expenses can be passed
along to tenants. However, residential properties typically do not have
this attribute, meaning that the risk of increases in building operating
costs is borne by the property owner for the duration of the lease.
A
positive aspect of residential properties is that in some countries,
government-insured financing is available. At the expense of a small
premium, insured financing lowers the interest rate on mortgages,
thereby enhancing potential returns from the investment.
E Estates
E Estates.co is your one stop shop for Land and Property Speculation - Contact us today
Friday, 17 February 2012
Monday, 6 February 2012
Location Location Location
Real Estate Investments:
How about location within location?
When deciding about a property purchase as capital
investment, the selection of the correct location plays an important
role. “Location, location, location” is probably the oldest wise saying
in the field of real estate; even the Roman Emperor Caesar evidently
recognized this and built his forts at top-locations, like Rhine
(Rhein) and Main.
Until today, nothing much has changed about it. "Rhein Main" could be said to be a typical major or macro location.
But once one has agreed about the macro location,
the rest of the homework is far from being complete. About just as
crucial is the question of the micro location.
What is a micro-location? Let’s consider a city as Cape Town as the macro location; it is the city (or if
applicable the region - in this case the Western Cape), the larger
perimeter of choice.
In other words, the micro location is the small location, the “mini location” within the larger scope, the macro location.
This can be explained easily with some current
examples. As before, we are taking Cape Town as a model. Without
question, Camps Bay is always part of the top real estate locations in Cape Town ; it generally ranges traditionally next after Stellenbosh as number
two or sometimes number three but seldom further down.
However, for a private investor, who wants to
invest in a property as capital investment, normally the residential
property is what interests him most – hence we can examine the best
micro locations with regard to living.
Which are the best living locations in Cape Town?
No problem to answer that, if one is an insider and knows the city – of
course one first would name Camps Bay, Paarl, Stellenbosh
and almost in the same breath.
But strictly speaking however, these are only districts and no real micro locations.
If we allege that some areas are less desirable, we need to
ask: Less desirable for whom? For everone? Or reverse: Are there people
who like to live in locations that are “less desirable for some”? When
going for a stroll in the streets around the local station one will
find out very fast that no flat stays empty apparently, thus some
people obviously don’t mind. Someone is always living there – after all,
it is still Camps Bay.
Here enters the question of one’s own investment
philosophy. Let us take the example of an average investor who would
like to let out lastingly for a good rent to a clientele who works in Cape Town, has a good level of income and more elevated demands to the
living ambience.
Didn’t we just define a target group for our acquired property? Exactly so!
Thus we, as potential investor, always need to ask the following questions first:
Whom would I like to have as tenant? Which kind of
future tenant do I have in mind as my partner, who shall pay the major
part of the property for me in the long run, but who is also willing to
take care of it and to treat it well?
Admittedly, most capital investors seldom ask
themselves such difficult questions, or they simply work out that point
of the checklist without further ado in their subconscious.
Also this is easily understood:
Anyone who spent half of his life in a certain
city, knows intuitively the areas he should avoid and those he should
look for. And he knows which clientele of tenants likes most to live
where. In accordance with this, he will make his pre-selection without
needing any sophisticated preparations.
We have however asked a crucial question for the
understanding of the term micro location. That question is: Which
clientele of tenants do I want to get?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)