When you're looking at the 
underlying real estate, one of the most important criteria (aside from 
location, location, location!) is the type of property. When 
considering a purchase, you need to ask yourself whether the underlying 
properties are, for example, residential homes, shopping malls, 
warehouses, office towers or a combination of any of these. Each type of
 real estate has a different set of drivers influencing its performance.
 You can't simply assume one type of property will perform well in a 
market where a different type is performing well. Likewise, you can't 
assume one type of property will continue to be a good investment simply
 because it has performed well in the past.
 Income-Producing and Non-Income-Producing InvestmentsThere
 are four broad types of income-producing real estate: offices, retail, 
industrial and leased residential. There are many other less common 
types as well, such as hotels, mini-storage, parking lots and seniors 
care housing. The key criteria in these investments that we are focusing
 on is that they are income producing.
Non-income-producing
 investments, such as houses, vacation properties or vacant commercial 
buildings, are as sound as income-producing investments. Just keep in 
mind that if you invest equity in a non-income producing property you 
will not receive any rent, so all of your return must be through capital appreciation.
 If you invest in debt secured by non-income-producing real estate, 
remember that the borrower's personal income must be sufficient to cover
 the mortgage payments, because there is no tenant income to secure the 
payments.
Office PropertyOffices
 are the "flagship" investment for many real estate owners. They tend to
 be, on average, the largest and highest profile property type because 
of their typical location in downtown cores and sprawling suburban 
office parks.
At its most fundamental level, the 
demand for office space is tied to companies' requirement for office 
workers, and the average space per office worker. The typical office 
worker is involved in things like finance, accounting, insurance, real 
estate, services, management and administration. As these "white-collar"
 jobs grow, there is greater demand for office spaces.
Returns
 from office properties can be highly variable because the market tends 
to be sensitive to economic performance. One downside is that office 
buildings have high operating costs, so if you lose a tenant it can have
 a substantial impact on the returns for the property. However, in times
 of prosperity, offices tend to perform extremely well, because demand 
for space causes rental rates to increase and an extended time period is
 required to build an office tower to relieve the pressure on the market
 and rents.
Retail PropertyThere
 is a wide variety of Retail properties, ranging from large enclosed 
shopping malls to single tenant buildings in pedestrian zones. At the 
present time, the Power Center format is in favor, with retailers 
occupying larger premises than in the enclosed mall format, and having 
greater visibility and access from adjacent roadways.
Many retail properties have an anchor,
 which is a large, well-known retailer that acts as a draw to the 
center. An example of a well-known anchor is Wal-Mart. If a retail 
property has a food store as an anchor, it is said to be food-anchored or grocery-anchored;
 such anchors would typically enhance the fundamentals of a property and
 make it more desirable for investment. Often, a retail center has one 
or more ancillary multi-bay buildings containing smaller tenants. One of
 these small units is termed a commercial retail unit (CRU).
The
 demand for retail space has many drivers. Among them are: location, 
visibility, population density, population growth and relative income 
levels. From an economic perspective, retails tend to perform best in 
growing economies and when retail sales growth is high.
Returns
 from Retails tend to be more stable than Offices, in part because 
retail leases are generally longer and retailers are less inclined to 
relocate as compared to office tenants.
Industrial PropertyIndustrials
 are often considered the "staple" of the average real estate investor. 
Generally, they require smaller average investments, are less management
 intensive and have lower operating costs than their office and retail 
counterparts.
There are varying types of industrials
 depending on the use of the building. For example, buildings could be 
used for warehousing, manufacturing, research and development, or 
distribution. Some industrials can even have partial or full office 
build-outs.
Some important factors to consider in an
 industrial property would be functionality (for example, ceiling 
height), location relative to major transport routes (including rail or 
sea), building configuration, loading and the degree of specialization 
in the space (such as whether it has cranes or freezers). For some uses,
 the presence of outdoor or covered yard space is important.
Multi-family Residential PropertyMulti-family
 residential property generally delivers the most stable returns, 
because no matter what the economic cycle, people always need a place to
 live. The result is that in normal markets, residential occupancy tends
 to stay reasonably high. Another factor contributing to the stability 
of residential property is that the loss of a single tenant has a 
minimal impact on the bottom line, whereas if you lose a tenant in any other type of property the negative effects can be much more significant.
For most commercial property types, tenant leases are either net
 or partially net, meaning that most operating expenses can be passed 
along to tenants. However, residential properties typically do not have 
this attribute, meaning that the risk of increases in building operating
 costs is borne by the property owner for the duration of the lease.
A
 positive aspect of residential properties is that in some countries, 
government-insured financing is available. At the expense of a small 
premium, insured financing lowers the interest rate on mortgages, 
thereby enhancing potential returns from the investment.
E Estates
E Estates.co is your one stop shop for Land and Property Speculation - Contact us today
Friday, 17 February 2012
Monday, 6 February 2012
Location Location Location
Real Estate Investments: 
  How about location within location?
When  deciding about a property purchase as capital 
investment, the selection of the  correct location plays an important 
role. “Location, location, location” is  probably the oldest wise saying
 in the field of real estate; even the Roman  Emperor Caesar evidently 
recognized this and built his forts at top-locations,  like Rhine 
(Rhein) and Main.
Until  today, nothing much has changed about it. "Rhein Main" could be said  to be a typical major or macro location.
But once  one has agreed about the macro location, 
the rest of the homework is far from  being complete. About just as 
crucial is the question of the micro location.
What is a  micro-location? Let’s consider a city as Cape Town as the macro  location; it is the city (or if 
applicable the region - in this case the Western Cape), the larger
 perimeter of choice.
In other  words, the micro location is the small location, the “mini location” within the  larger scope, the macro location.
This can be  explained easily with some current 
examples. As before, we are taking Cape Town as a model. Without 
question, Camps Bay is always part of the top real  estate locations in Cape Town ; it generally ranges traditionally next after  Stellenbosh as number 
two or sometimes number three but seldom further down.
However,  for a private investor, who wants to 
invest in a property as capital  investment, normally the residential 
property is what interests him most –  hence we can examine the best 
micro locations with regard to living.
Which are  the best living locations in Cape Town? 
No problem to answer that, if one is an  insider and knows the city – of
 course one first would name Camps Bay, Paarl, Stellenbosh 
and almost in the same breath.
But  strictly speaking however, these are only districts and no real micro  locations.
 
 If we allege that some  areas are less desirable, we need to 
ask: Less desirable for whom? For everone?  Or reverse: Are there people
 who like to live in locations that are “less  desirable for some”? When
 going for a stroll in the streets around the local  station one will 
find out very fast that no flat stays empty apparently, thus  some 
people obviously don’t mind. Someone is always living there – after all,
  it is still Camps Bay.
Here enters  the question of one’s own investment 
philosophy. Let us take the example of an  average investor who would 
like to let out lastingly for a good rent to a  clientele who works in Cape Town, has a good level of income and more elevated  demands to the 
living ambience.
Didn’t we  just define a target group for our acquired property? Exactly so!
Thus we, as  potential investor, always need to ask the following questions first:
Whom would  I like to have as tenant? Which kind of 
future tenant do I have in mind as my  partner, who shall pay the major 
part of the property for me in the long run,  but who is also willing to
 take care of it and to treat it well?
Admittedly,  most capital investors seldom ask 
themselves such difficult questions, or they  simply work out that point
 of the checklist without further ado in their  subconscious.
Also this  is easily understood:
Anyone who  spent half of his life in a certain 
city, knows intuitively the areas he should  avoid and those he should 
look for. And he knows which clientele of tenants  likes most to live 
where. In accordance with this, he will make his  pre-selection without 
needing any sophisticated preparations.
We have  however asked a crucial question for the 
understanding of the term micro  location. That question is: Which 
clientele of tenants do I want to get?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

